Harboursandport.com: Lagos - A former Commissioner for Insurance and Chief Executive Officer of the National Insurance Commission, NAICOM, Mr. Mohammed Kari has objected to the registration of the Nigerian Police Force insurance company on the grounds that the police lack the ability to effectively manage a business.
In an
objection letter addressed to the Commissioner for Insurance, titled
‘Registration of the NPF Insurance Company – An Objection’ Kari stated: “I
refer to your publication and request for objection on the above subject.
![]() |
Mohammed Kari - Former Commissioner For Insurance |
“I am writing to formally object to the registration of the NPF Insurance Company Limited. My objection is based on several critical concerns that I believe warrant serious consideration. Before I lay out the concerns, |’ll take the opportunity to introduce myself, thus indication why I have a first-hand justification for my objections.
“I was an
active player in the Nigerian insurance industry from 1979 to 2023. In this
period, | was the Managing Director/Chief Executive officer of Nigeria
Reinsurance Corporation and NICON Insurance Plc and later the Commissioner for
Insurance/Chief Executive of National Insurance
Commission (NAICOM). I was also a consultant in the sector in between
these offices. I had the benefit of being an insurer to Nigeria Police Force
(NPF), a reinsurer to their insurance providers and of course a regulator of
the whole industry.”
Stating his
concerns, Kari noted: “The core operations of the Nigeria Police Force are
fundamentally at odds with commercial activities. The primary mandate of the
Police is to maintain law and order, not to engage in business ventures.
Allowing the Police to operate an insurance company could lead to conflicts of
interest and distract from their essential duties. The Police is a regulator of
sorts, they cannot be enforcing the law on compulsory insurance and be a
provider of insurance. The temptation to force motorist to insure with their
company will be irresistible.
“The
structure and ownership requirements stipulated by Nigerian insurance laws and
Financial Reporting Council necessitate a level of expertise that is currently
lacking within the nominated Board of Directors and the Police force. Another
requirement is a spread in ownership to avoid undue influence on the company by
one shareholder. The authoritative nature of the police and their potential
representation on the Board of Directors could lead to undue interference in
the management of the insurance company, compromising its independence and
effectiveness.
“The Nigeria
Police Force investments have a history of mismanagement, as evidenced by the
numerous issues surrounding the Nigeria Police Pension Scheme. This history
raises significant doubts about the ability of the Police to effectively manage
an insurance company, which requires a high level of expertise and know-how.
“The
fragmentation of the insurance business would result in the loss of valuable data
and income for the industry. The entry of the Nigeria Police into the insurance
market could disrupt the existing ecosystem, leading to inefficiencies and
potential data loss that could harm the overall industry. In case they are
floating the idea of a captive, I don’t believe the Nigeria Police Force has
enough business spread or expertise to support the survival of a captive
company neither do they have the reputation to attract independent business.
This would expose public funds to unwarranted loss.”
Kari
continued: “The command-and-control nature of the Police force would make them
take offence of a caution by a regulator. I don’t see how the Police can
operate under someone’s regulation, for they would not accept commercial
directive, and neither would they observe regulatory control. It would
compromise the authority of the regulator if one company is seen to ignore
regulatory control or out rightly disregard them, the regulator would lose his
authority to regulate the market.
“When I was
an operator and ‘their Insurer, the NPF as a consumer had detained a Head of
Department and I, the CEO when we rejected to pay for a loss that was not
insured on their policy. Can the CEO of an NPF Insurance Company refused to pay
any demand of his owners, whether insured or not?
“When I was
a regulator, the NPF as a consumer, have requested on many occasions to obtain
waivers to bypass the Nigerian Insurance Industry to place their businesses
directly abroad, and on all occasions, we have refused them. (These requests
were made against the advice of their Broker and Insurer) I can just imagine what they would do as a
registered insurance company.
“Approving
this application could set a concerning precedent. It may encourage other
government agencies, such as the Federal Road Safety Corps, Nigeria Customs
Service, Nigerian Army, Navy, Air Force, Nigeria Civil Defence Corps, Office of
the Head of Service of the Federation and others, to seek similar licenses.
(And why not?) The Commission can therefore not refuse them. This proliferation
of government-run insurance companies could undermine the integrity and
stability of the insurance sector and reverse the government policy of
divesting from business, which as you remember was the reason of the creation
of the Bureau for Public Enterprise (BPE). I suggest you seek the opinion of
the Bureau as you continue with your consideration.
“Considering
these concerns, | strongly urge the National Insurance Commission to reject the
application for the registration of the Nigeria Police Insurance Company
Limited. It is imperative to maintain the focus of the Police on their primary
responsibilities and to ensure that the insurance sector remains managed by
entities with the requisite expertise and independence.”
No comments:
Post a Comment